I’ve worked hard on having a program tailored to the over-40 crowd for quite a while, and actually completed it a short time ago but am awaiting the finalization of some marketing tie-ups that are out of my hands, and in the control of third parties.

I have experimented a great great deal with diet change-ups over the years, as well as trying a huge range of foods to see how they impacted me, and how they affect the masses in general.

I’ll be excited to reference the twists to the Atkins plan that make it work, and is largely the way I live and eat…but with another added little side track that takes me WAY outside Atkins style of eating, and into a virtual opposite that can also work really well, and has for me over the past year of testing.

I will present this in my FLFL program as well of course, while explaining how the latter can also benefit the over 40 crowd more from a standpoint of helping to manage the challenges we have with health and injury-related issues.  I have modified both the plans in such a way as to benefit myself most optimally, and believe these modifications can be applied on a mass scale as well, once people have an understanding of how and when best to implement them.

It’s really exciting, more than anything from the standpoint of not having seen this combo offered elsewhere, and having enough personal experience with it now to want to share it and get feedback from others who might go down the same roads.

Very busy lately, apologies for the lack of blogging lately; am working with a lot of people on exploring these new avenues, and the time investment in education and experimentation can often be overwhelming.

But it’s my life, and I find joy in the pursuit.  🙂

Love, Happiness, Health and Peace……………………..Tim

Very disappointed to find that heart.org seems to be in bed with the canola empire.

Canola oil is controversial, and will remain that way for a long time.  The vast majority of it that is in our foods is GMO, unless it is specifically stated on the label that it is not.  I personally feel this label may in fact be somewhat misleading, as the manufacture of canola, from my research, seems to be of gmo origin by default.  So I’m not sure how the labeling can claim otherwise.

Every single time we read information about any product on the internet, it becomes necessary to bear in mind where the funding may be coming from that provides the research, and what is being promoted in the process.  This goes for everything, including my program, and should be applied without exception.  I promote products in my program because I use them myself and believe in them.  Heart.org seems to promote canola oil for the same reason, despite me personally, and many other researchers, feeling it is a near-poisonous oil, and reduction to elimination of it among other oils in the diet too often provides positive results.

Experience is more important than opinion or position.

Heart.org also poo-poos saturated fats universally.  Plenty of studies are revealing that a *small* amount of saturated fats may be hugely beneficial for endocrine/hormonal health, and in my experience of consuming small amounts for a long time now I agree.

But with the western diet so overloaded with oils, the last thing that should be promoted in my opinion is the virtual liberal use of a very questionable oil, especially one that has a huge financial influence and interest behind it.  The fact that they would promote this as literally a “healthy” oil, bothers me a great deal.  And just because it is non-hydrogenated, does not suddenly make it healthy, another erroneous assumption too many people make.

I’ll be doing a video on oils soon…………….T